Comments on: The end is possibly very nigh, thanks to particle physicists http://www.astrofiammante.net/the-end-is-possibly-very-nigh-thanks-to-particle-physicists-post188/ “I have spent a reasonable percentage of my life in libraries – I like the hush.” Robin Ince Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:28:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: JTankers http://www.astrofiammante.net/the-end-is-possibly-very-nigh-thanks-to-particle-physicists-post188/comment-page-1/#comment-5 JTankers Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:11:20 +0000 http://www.astrofiammante.net/blog/?p=188#comment-5 CERN argues that the chances of danger are in reality zero. The safety opposition alleges that CERN is misrepresenting the facts and the probabilities. If CERN's assumptions and calculations are wrong, as many scientists believe, then the chances for danger may be high, possibly very high. Only a very small number of physicists have studied the safety arguments in detail, and the results are very mixed. Most of the reviews are linked to CERN, either CERN scientists, CERN Scientific Policy Committee members or scientists requested to comment as a favor to CERN. Other fully independent physicists including senior Physics PHD Dr. Rainer Plaga wrote a paper refuting safety and proposing risk mitigation measures, currently ignored by CERN. Visiting Professor of Physics Dr. Otto Rossler is an award winning and famous contributor to Chaos Theory and the founder of Endophysics. Dr. Rossler also refutes CERN's claims that white dwarf and neutron stars are susceptible to fast moving micro black holes, Dr. Rossler contends that CERN's experiment may pose an existential risk to the planet. Dr. Rossler calculates that creation of micro black holes could be catastrophic to Earth in years, decades or centuries. Former cosmic ray researcher, California math champion and Nuclear Safety Officer Walter L. Wagner discovered flaws with CERN's safety arguments. He calculates stable strange matter creation (particularly from Lead Lead collisions) and dangerous micro black hole creation has not been excluded and might as likely prove catastrophic. Got LHCFacts.org? CERN argues that the chances of danger are in reality zero. The safety opposition alleges that CERN is misrepresenting the facts and the probabilities. If CERN’s assumptions and calculations are wrong, as many scientists believe, then the chances for danger may be high, possibly very high.

Only a very small number of physicists have studied the safety arguments in detail, and the results are very mixed.

Most of the reviews are linked to CERN, either CERN scientists, CERN Scientific Policy Committee members or scientists requested to comment as a favor to CERN.

Other fully independent physicists including senior Physics PHD Dr. Rainer Plaga wrote a paper refuting safety and proposing risk mitigation measures, currently ignored by CERN.

Visiting Professor of Physics Dr. Otto Rossler is an award winning and famous contributor to Chaos Theory and the founder of Endophysics. Dr. Rossler also refutes CERN’s claims that white dwarf and neutron stars are susceptible to fast moving micro black holes, Dr. Rossler contends that CERN’s experiment may pose an existential risk to the planet.

Dr. Rossler calculates that creation of micro black holes could be catastrophic to Earth in years, decades or centuries.

Former cosmic ray researcher, California math champion and Nuclear Safety Officer Walter L. Wagner discovered flaws with CERN’s safety arguments. He calculates stable strange matter creation (particularly from Lead Lead collisions) and dangerous micro black hole creation has not been excluded and might as likely prove catastrophic.

Got LHCFacts.org?

]]>